From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Pair

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division
Oct 10, 2007
No. B194307 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 2007)

Opinion


Page 1130b

155 Cal.App.4th 1130b __ Cal.Rptr.3d__ SUZAN HUGHES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER PAIR, Defendant and Respondent. B194307 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Fifth Division October 10, 2007

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC338385

ORDERING MODIFYING OPINION

THE COURT:

Kriegler, J., Mosk, J.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on September 10, 2007, (154 Cal.App.4th 1469; 65 Cal.Rptr.3d 619).] and, certified for publication, be modified in the following particular:

On [154 Cal.App.4th 1474, advance report, fn. 3] page 2, after line 1 of footnote 3, add the following:

However, Pair denies making the statements alleged by Hughes. Pair recognizes that Hughes’s evidence must be viewed as true for purposes of summary judgment. His summary judgment motion therefore accepts the statements as true, despite his denial.

There is no change in the judgment.


Summaries of

Hughes v. Pair

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division
Oct 10, 2007
No. B194307 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Hughes v. Pair

Case Details

Full title:SUZAN HUGHES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER PAIR, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Fifth Division

Date published: Oct 10, 2007

Citations

No. B194307 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 2007)