From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Magnus-Stinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Sep 10, 2012
No. 1:12-cv-1254-TWP-DML (S.D. Ind. Sep. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:12-cv-1254-TWP-DML

09-10-2012

MARK S. HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, Defendant.


Entry and Order

Plaintiff Hughes' request to proceed in forma pauperis [Dkt. 3] is denied because he is ineligible under 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g) for that status. His "strikes" are chronicled in Hughes v. Bush, 3:06-cv-0530-RL-CAN (N.D.Ind. September 13, 2006).

Hughes shall have through October 3, 2012, in which to either pay the $350.00 filing fee or demonstrate that, with respect to his claim against President Obama, he is in imminent physical danger. See Ciarpaglini v. Saini, 352 F.3d 328, 330 (7th Cir. 2003).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

Hon. Tanya Walton Pratt, Judge

United States District Court

Southern District of Indiana
Distribution: Mark S. Hughes
#894549
New Castle Correctional Facility
1000 Van Nuys Road
P.O. Box A
New Castle, IN 47362


Summaries of

Hughes v. Magnus-Stinson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
Sep 10, 2012
No. 1:12-cv-1254-TWP-DML (S.D. Ind. Sep. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Hughes v. Magnus-Stinson

Case Details

Full title:MARK S. HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

Date published: Sep 10, 2012

Citations

No. 1:12-cv-1254-TWP-DML (S.D. Ind. Sep. 10, 2012)