From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Connell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 6, 2015
5:15CV00311-JLH (E.D. Ark. Oct. 6, 2015)

Opinion

5:15CV00311-JLH

10-06-2015

OTIS HUGHES, ADC # 100835 PLAINTIFF v. KEITH CONNELL, Police Chief, Stuttgart Police Department; et al. DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order entered separately today, the complaint of Otis Hughes is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment or the accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of October, 2015.

/s/_________

J. LEON HOLMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hughes v. Connell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Oct 6, 2015
5:15CV00311-JLH (E.D. Ark. Oct. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Hughes v. Connell

Case Details

Full title:OTIS HUGHES, ADC # 100835 PLAINTIFF v. KEITH CONNELL, Police Chief…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Oct 6, 2015

Citations

5:15CV00311-JLH (E.D. Ark. Oct. 6, 2015)