From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughes v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Apr 18, 2011
No. CV-07-1850-JE (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV-07-1850-JE.

April 18, 2011

David B. Lowry, Attorney at Law, Portland, OR, Attorneys for Plaintiff.

Adrian L. Brown, U.S. Attorney's Office, District of Oregon, Portland, OR.

Mathew W. Pile, Social Security Administration, Office of the General Counsel, Seattle, WA, Attorneys for Defendant.


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Jelderks issued a Findings and Recommendation (# 54) on March 29, 2011, in which he recommends that this Court deny Plaintiff's motion to recover Equal Access to Justice Act attorney fees and costs (# 47). The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) ( de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Jelderks' Findings and Recommendation (# 54). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to recover EAJA attorney fees and costs (# 47) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hughes v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Apr 18, 2011
No. CV-07-1850-JE (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Hughes v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Anthony R. Hughes, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Apr 18, 2011

Citations

No. CV-07-1850-JE (D. Or. Apr. 18, 2011)