From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hughbanks v. Hudson

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Aug 26, 2009
Case No. 1:07-cv-111 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 26, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07-cv-111.

August 26, 2009


ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING


This capital habeas corpus case is before the Court on Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. No. 81). The sole witness proposed in this Motion is Dr. Robert Smith, whose affidavit was presented in state post-conviction proceedings, but who was not permitted to testify live in those proceedings because Petitioner's motion for a hearing was denied in its entirety.

The Motion was filed on July 7, 2009, and has not been opposed by Respondent; the time for opposition has expired. This alone could be cause for granting the Motion under S. D. Ohio Civ. R. 7.2(a)(2). The Court finds in addition that the Motion satisfies the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e)(2).

Accordingly, the Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is granted. This is without prejudice to the Court's determination of Petitioner's Motion for Supplementation of the Record (Doc. No. 87) which will be ripe for decision on September 1, 2009, or whenever Petitioner timely files a reply memorandum.


Summaries of

Hughbanks v. Hudson

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Aug 26, 2009
Case No. 1:07-cv-111 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Hughbanks v. Hudson

Case Details

Full title:GARY L. HUGHBANKS, JR., Petitioner, v. STUART HUDSON, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Aug 26, 2009

Citations

Case No. 1:07-cv-111 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 26, 2009)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Rogers

ew" evidence in determining whether cause and prejudice exists to excuse procedural default of claims);…