Huggins v. State

Full title: Nakia HUGGINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jul 10, 2013

118 So. 3d 235 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

No. 3D12–3192.

2013-07-10

Nakia HUGGINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Bronwyn C. Miller, Judge. Nakia Huggins, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami–Dade County, Bronwyn C. Miller, Judge.
Nakia Huggins, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before ROTHENBERG and EMAS, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Geter v. State, 115 So.3d 375 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

ROTHENBERG, J., AND SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge, concur.

EMAS, J., dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in my dissent to the denial of motion for rehearing en banc in Geter v. State, 3D12–1736 (Fla. 3d DCA June 26, 2013), I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in the instant case to the extent it holds that the rule announced in Miller v. Alabama, ––– U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct appeal.