From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huggins v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 23, 2021
17-cv-06872-JSC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2021)

Opinion

17-cv-06872-JSC

07-23-2021

ANTONIO HUGGINS, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant.


ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY HIS LAWSUIT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge.

On May 5, 2021, pursuant to stipulation by the parties, the Court scheduled a Case Management Conference for July 22, 2021. (Dkt. No. 44.) Under the standing order of this Court, the parties were directed to file a joint case management statement one week in advance of the Case Management Conference.

All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (Dkt. Nos. 7, 16.)

On May 11, 2021, Plaintiff's counsel moved to withdraw from the case, noting that Plaintiff gave knowing and free assent to counsel's withdrawal. (Dkt. No. 45.) The Court granted the motion. (Dkt. No. 46.)

In advance of the Case Management Conference, Defendant filed a unilateral case management statement. (Dkt. Nos. 47, 48.) Defendant attempted to contact Plaintiff as well as Plaintiff's former counsel, but Plaintiff did not cooperate with Defendant to produce a joint case management statement, nor did he file a unilateral statement of his own. (Dkt. No. 48 at 1.) Thereafter, Plaintiff failed to appear for the Case Management Conference on July 22, 2021.

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 based on

Plaintiffs failure to appear for the Case Management Conference. Plaintiff shall appear and show cause on August 26, 2021 at 1:30 p.m., by Zoom videoconference. Plaintiff shall submit a written response to this Order by August 19, 2021 showing cause as to why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Mr. Huggins is warned that failure to comply with this Order, including attending the hearing on August 26, 2021, may result in the dismissal of this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

The Court encourages Mr. Huggins to seek free assistance from the Northern District's Legal Help Center, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 15th Floor, Room 2796, San Francisco, CA 94102. In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, Mr. Huggins should make a telephone appointment by calling (415) 782-8982. The website for the Northern District of California also has information for litigants who are not represented by counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Huggins v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 23, 2021
17-cv-06872-JSC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Huggins v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO HUGGINS, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 23, 2021

Citations

17-cv-06872-JSC (N.D. Cal. Jul. 23, 2021)