From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huftile v. Vognsen

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 6, 2005
No. CIV S-03-0604 DFL JFM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-0604 DFL JFM P.

December 6, 2005


FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS


By order filed October 24, 2005, plaintiff's second amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a third amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Huftile v. Vognsen

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 6, 2005
No. CIV S-03-0604 DFL JFM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2005)
Case details for

Huftile v. Vognsen

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HUFTILE, Plaintiff, v. JACK VOGNSEN, Ph.D., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 6, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-03-0604 DFL JFM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2005)