Opinion
No. 43, 2003.
June 13, 2003.
Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 02M-08-002.
APPEAL DISMISSED
Unpublished Opinion is below
HUFF v. HOOPER, 43 (Del. 6-13-2003) RONALD HUFF and SHAMSIDIN ALI a/k/a ROBERT SAUNDERS, Petitioners Below, Appellants, v. DR. MICHAEL HOOPER, RANDY PARKER, WARDEN RICK KEARNEY and COMMISSIONER STANLEY TAYLOR, Respondents Below, Appellees. No. 43, 2003. Supreme Court of Delaware. June 13, 2003.
Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County C.A. No. 02M-08-002.
Randy J. Holland, Justice.
ORDER
This 13th day of June 2003, it appears to the Court that, on May 21, 2003, the Clerk issued a notice to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) for appellants' failure to diligently prosecute the appeal by not filing their opening brief and appendix. Appellants have failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.