From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huff v. Baskerville

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 12, 2007
241 F. App'x 941 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-6177.

Submitted: August 27, 2007.

Decided: September 12, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. (3:06-cv-00147-MHL).

Johnny R. Huff, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Johnny R. Huff appeals the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Huff v. Baskerville, No. 3:06-cv-00147-MHL (E.D.Va. Jan. 24, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Huff v. Baskerville

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 12, 2007
241 F. App'x 941 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Huff v. Baskerville

Case Details

Full title:Johnny R. HUFF, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. A. BASKERVILLE, Warden; S…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 12, 2007

Citations

241 F. App'x 941 (4th Cir. 2007)