From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 31, 1998
722 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 98-936.

December 31, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; Reginald K. Whitehead, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Leonard R. Ross, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


There is no double jeopardy violation when a defendant is convicted of the crime of delivery of a controlled substance and possession with intent to sell the same substance, because each crime contains an element that the other does not. Sec. 775.021(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1997); State v. McCloud, 577 So.2d 939 (Fla. 1991). Cf. Paccione v. State, 698 So.2d 252 (Fla. 1997).

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., ANTOON, J., and ORFINGER, M., Senior Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Huey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 31, 1998
722 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Huey v. State

Case Details

Full title:Danny HUEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 31, 1998

Citations

722 So. 2d 286 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Johnson v. State

In doing so, we relied upon McCloud, reasoning that “[a]s the [certified] question is worded and answered in…

Johnson v. State

In doing so, we relied upon McCloud, reasoning that "[a]s the [certified] question is worded and answered in…