From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huelsman v. Grosz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 26, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-00413 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 26, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-00413

02-26-2014

CARL E. HUELSMAN, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM RUSSELL GROSZ, Defendant.


District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #10), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is hereby ORDERED that the Complaint be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

__________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Huelsman v. Grosz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Feb 26, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-00413 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 26, 2014)
Case details for

Huelsman v. Grosz

Case Details

Full title:CARL E. HUELSMAN, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM RUSSELL GROSZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Feb 26, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-00413 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 26, 2014)