From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 7, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1302-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1302-MCE-GGH P.

October 7, 2008


ORDER


Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned case be reassigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.

IT IS ORDERED that any hearing dates currently set before the undersigned are vacated.

I am the magistrate judge currently assigned to this case. I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings, including trial and entry of final judgment, by myself or such other magistrate judge as may be assigned.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Gregory G. Hollows. HENCEFORTH, THE CAPTION ON DOCUMENTS FILED IN THE REASSIGNED CASE SHALL BE SHOWN AS No. CIV S-08-1302 GGH P.


Summaries of

Hudson v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 7, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1302-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2008)
Case details for

Hudson v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:MARCO HUDSON, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 7, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1302-MCE-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2008)