Opinion
NO. 09-10-00581-CRNO. 09-10-00582-CR
10-12-2011
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2
Orange County, Texas
Trial Cause Nos. E-101571, E-101496
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury found Isaac Hudson guilty of criminal trespass and possession of marihuana and assessed punishment at five days in county jail for the trespass offense and 120 days in county jail for the possession offense. We affirm the judgments.
On appeal, Hudson's counsel filed a brief that presents counsel's professional evaluation of the record and that concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On June 30, 2011, we granted an extension of time for the appellant to file a pro se brief. Hudson has not filed a response.
We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel's conclusion that no arguable issues support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court's judgments.
Appellant may challenge our decision in these cases by filing petitions for discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
AFFIRMED.
___________________________
HOLLIS HORTON
Justice
Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.