From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 19, 2002
93 S.W.3d 694 (Ark. 2002)

Opinion

CR 02-1283

Opinion delivered December 19, 2002

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the appeal was not timely filed due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.

Montgomery, Adams Wyatt, by: Dale E. Adams, for appellant.

No response.


Appellant, Allan Wayne Hudson, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Attorney Dale E. Adams admits by motion that the appeal was not timely filed due to a mistake on his part. [1] We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) ( per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.


Summaries of

Hudson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 19, 2002
93 S.W.3d 694 (Ark. 2002)
Case details for

Hudson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Allan Wayne HUDSON v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 19, 2002

Citations

93 S.W.3d 694 (Ark. 2002)
93 S.W.3d 694

Citing Cases

McDonald v. State

Additionally, relief is available under Rule 2-2 where an attorney has erred. Hudson v. State, 351 Ark. 383,…