Summary
In Hudson v. Spisak, ___ U.S. ___, 75 U.S.L.W. 3638 (Oct. 9, 2007), the Supreme Court summarily remanded the case to the Sixth Circuit to further consider its opinion "in light of Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. ___ (2006), and Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. ___ (2007)."
Summary of this case from Noling v. BradshawOpinion
No. 06–1535.
2007-10-9
Stuart HUDSON, Warden, petitioner, v. Frank G. SPISAK, Jr.
Case below, Spisak v. Mitchell, 465 F.3d 684.
Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. ––––, 127 S.Ct. 649, 166 L.Ed.2d 482 (2006), and Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. ––––, 127 S.Ct. 1933, 167 L.Ed.2d 836 (2007).