From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Seibel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 28, 2016
No. CV 15-4760 BRO (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2016)

Opinion

No. CV 15-4760 BRO (FFM)

03-28-2016

BRIAN L. HUDSON, Petitioner, v. KIMBERLY SEIBEL, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Respondent's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition without prejudice. DATED: March 28, 2016

/s/_________

BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hudson v. Seibel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 28, 2016
No. CV 15-4760 BRO (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2016)
Case details for

Hudson v. Seibel

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN L. HUDSON, Petitioner, v. KIMBERLY SEIBEL, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 28, 2016

Citations

No. CV 15-4760 BRO (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 28, 2016)