Hudson v. Sauers

Full title: NICHOLAS HUDSON, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT SAUERS, et al., Respondents.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 23, 2012

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-5972 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 23, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-5972

02-23-2012

NICHOLAS HUDSON, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT SAUERS, et al., Respondents.

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2012, upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. No. 1), the Response thereto (Doc. No. 7), and Petitioner's Reply and Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 10), and after review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (Doc. No. 13), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.¹
2. The petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. The Motion to Stay is DENIED.
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

1 I note that the petitioner did not file objections to the Report and Recommendation.

BY THE COURT:

_______________

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.