From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Phiffier

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
1:21-cv-01254-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01254-JLT (PC)

09-09-2021

ROBERT HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN C. PHIFFIER, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14-DAY DEADLINE

On August 19, 2021, this Court entered an order requiring Plaintiff to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) or pay the $402 filing fee within fourteen days. (Doc. 4.) The Court cautioned, “ Failure to respond to this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. ” (Id. (alteration in original).) More than fourteen days has passed, and Plaintiff has failed to respond to the order.

Accordingly, within 14 days from the date of service, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to obey a court order. Alternatively, Plaintiff may submit a completed IFP application or pay the $402 filing fee within fourteen days. Failure to respond to this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for failure to obey a court order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hudson v. Phiffier

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 9, 2021
1:21-cv-01254-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Hudson v. Phiffier

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN C. PHIFFIER, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 9, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01254-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 9, 2021)