From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Palm Beach Tan, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Sep 13, 2024
1:23-cv-486 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 13, 2024)

Opinion

1:23-cv-486

09-13-2024

ALEX HUDSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. PALM BEACH TAN, INC., Defendants.


ORDER

On August 12, 2024, the United States Magistrate Judge's Order and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed and notice was served on the Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 20, 21.) In the Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be denied at this time, without prejudice to further consideration of the issues on subsequent dispositive motions. No objections were filed within the time prescribed by Section 636.

Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is hereby adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, (Doc. 20), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 16), is DENIED.


Summaries of

Hudson v. Palm Beach Tan, Inc.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Sep 13, 2024
1:23-cv-486 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Hudson v. Palm Beach Tan, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALEX HUDSON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 13, 2024

Citations

1:23-cv-486 (M.D.N.C. Sep. 13, 2024)

Citing Cases

Dawson v. Porch.Com

The 2003 TCPA Order discusses “voice calls,” “text calls,” and “short message service (SMS) calls,”…