From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Nangalama

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 27, 2011
NO. CIV S-09-2328 DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)

Opinion

NO. CIV S-09-2328 DAD (TEMP) P.

April 27, 2011


ORDER


Defendants have filed a request to vacate the deadlines requiring the parties to file pretrial statements. Defendants argue that pretrial statements should not be submitted until after the court rules on the motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, the request will be granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that motion to vacate the deadlines for submission of pretrial statements set in the scheduling order (Docket No. 30) is granted. DATED: April 26, 2011.


Summaries of

Hudson v. Nangalama

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 27, 2011
NO. CIV S-09-2328 DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)
Case details for

Hudson v. Nangalama

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS L. HUDSON Plaintiff, v. ANDREW NANGALAMA, et al. Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 27, 2011

Citations

NO. CIV S-09-2328 DAD (TEMP) P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2011)