From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Muniz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 14, 2016
Case No. CV 16-1732-JLS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-1732-JLS (KK)

12-14-2016

GEORGE HUDSON, Petitioner, v. W.L. MUNIZ, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code, section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice. Dated: December 14, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hudson v. Muniz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 14, 2016
Case No. CV 16-1732-JLS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Hudson v. Muniz

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE HUDSON, Petitioner, v. W.L. MUNIZ, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 14, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 16-1732-JLS (KK) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 14, 2016)