From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Law Office of L. Ryan Copeland, P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 14, 2012
No. 11-1384 (W.D. Tenn. Jun. 14, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-1384

06-14-2012

BRANDY HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. LAW OFFICE OF L. RYAN COPELAND, P.C., LINDSAY RYAN COPELAND, and JOHN DOE(S), Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to an order of reference entered on March 13, 2012, the magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation dated May 23, 2012 (D.E. 13) on the motion of the Plaintiff, Brandy Hudson, for default judgment against Defendants, Law Office of L. Ryan Copeland, P.C. and Lindsay Ryan Copeland (D.E. 9). The Court has reviewed the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and the entire record of the proceeding before the magistrate judge. No objections having been filed to the report and recommendation, the Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. It is therefore ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is hereby ADOPTED.

J. DANIEL BREEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hudson v. Law Office of L. Ryan Copeland, P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION
Jun 14, 2012
No. 11-1384 (W.D. Tenn. Jun. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Hudson v. Law Office of L. Ryan Copeland, P.C.

Case Details

Full title:BRANDY HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. LAW OFFICE OF L. RYAN COPELAND, P.C., LINDSAY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 14, 2012

Citations

No. 11-1384 (W.D. Tenn. Jun. 14, 2012)