From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Kleuessendorf

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 31, 2017
SC: 154789 (Mich. May. 31, 2017)

Opinion

SC: 154789

05-31-2017

BLANCHE HUDSON, Plaintiff, and PAT FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN C. KLEUESSENDORF and JOHN T. BENSON, Defendants-Appellees.


Order

154789 & (95) Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen Kurtis T. Wilder, Justices COA: 327878
Allegan CC: 13-052422-NZ

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 11, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for a subpoena is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 31, 2017

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Hudson v. Kleuessendorf

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 31, 2017
SC: 154789 (Mich. May. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Hudson v. Kleuessendorf

Case Details

Full title:BLANCHE HUDSON, Plaintiff, and PAT FOSTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOHN C…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: May 31, 2017

Citations

SC: 154789 (Mich. May. 31, 2017)