Hudson v. Hudson

Full title: H. Eugene HUDSON, Respondent, v. Mary Lee HUDSON, Petitioner.

Court: Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Date published: Oct 28, 2015

778 S.E.2d 482 (S.C. 2015)

778 S.E.2d 482

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2014–001347. No. 27584.

10-28-2015

H. Eugene HUDSON, Respondent, v. Mary Lee HUDSON, Petitioner.

Carolyn R. Hills, of Hills & Hills, PC, and Nicole Nicolette Mace, of The Mace Law Firm, both of Myrtle Beach, for petitioner. Charles D. Lee, III, of McLaren & Lee, of Columbia and E. Windell McCrackin, of McCrackin Barnett & Richardson, L.L.P., of Myrtle Beach, both for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Carolyn R. Hills, of Hills & Hills, PC, and Nicole Nicolette Mace, of The Mace Law Firm, both of Myrtle Beach, for petitioner.

Charles D. Lee, III, of McLaren & Lee, of Columbia and E. Windell McCrackin, of McCrackin Barnett & Richardson, L.L.P., of Myrtle Beach, both for respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' opinion in Hudson v. Hudson, 408 S.C. 76, 757 S.E.2d 727 (Ct.App.2014). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.