Hudson v. Hudson

Full title: H. Eugene Hudson, Respondent, v. Mary Lee Hudson, Petitioner.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court

Date published: Oct 28, 2015

Appellate Case No. 2014-001347 (S.C. Oct. 28, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2014-001347 Opinion No. 27584

10-28-2015

H. Eugene Hudson, Respondent, v. Mary Lee Hudson, Petitioner.

Carolyn R. Hills, of Hills & Hills, PC, and Nicole Nicolette Mace, of The Mace Law Firm, both of Myrtle Beach, for Petitioner. Charles D. Lee, III, of McLaren & Lee, of Columbia and E. Windell McCrackin, of McCrackin Barnett & Richardson, L.L.P., of Myrtle Beach, both for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal From Horry County
Timothy H. Pogue, Family Court Judge

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Carolyn R. Hills, of Hills & Hills, PC, and Nicole Nicolette Mace, of The Mace Law Firm, both of Myrtle Beach, for Petitioner.

Charles D. Lee, III, of McLaren & Lee, of Columbia and E. Windell McCrackin, of McCrackin Barnett & Richardson, L.L.P., of Myrtle Beach, both for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' opinion in Hudson v. Hudson, 408 S.C. 76, 757 S.E.2d 727 (Ct. App. 2014). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur. BEATTY, J., concurring in result only.