From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Gouldy

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Nov 30, 2021
3:21-CV-238-TAV-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

3:21-CV-238-TAV-HBG

11-30-2021

JAMARCUS HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN GOULDY, Defendant.


JUDGMENT ORDER

THOMAS A. VARLAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion filed herewith, Defendant Gouldy's motion for summary judgment [Doc 9] is GRANTED, his motion for extension of time to complete discovery [Doc. 16] is DENIED as moot, and this prisoner's pro se complaint for violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is DISMISSED without prejudice. Because the Court CERTIFIED in the memorandum opinion that any appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith, should Plaintiff file a notice of appeal, he is DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24.

The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE the file. 1


Summaries of

Hudson v. Gouldy

United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee
Nov 30, 2021
3:21-CV-238-TAV-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Hudson v. Gouldy

Case Details

Full title:JAMARCUS HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN GOULDY, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

3:21-CV-238-TAV-HBG (E.D. Tenn. Nov. 30, 2021)