From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Franco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 22, 2016
Case No. CV 14-1247-JLS (KK) (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-1247-JLS (KK)

05-22-2016

GEORGE HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. ALFREDO FRANCO, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code, section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows:

(1) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Alfredo Franco and Kirk Richardson in their official capacity are DISMISSED without leave to amend;

(2) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against Defendants Alfredo Franco and Kirk Richardson and Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and
(3) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim against Defendants Alfredo Franco and Kirk Richardson.
Dated: May 22, 2016

/s/_________

HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hudson v. Franco

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 22, 2016
Case No. CV 14-1247-JLS (KK) (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Hudson v. Franco

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE HUDSON, Plaintiff, v. ALFREDO FRANCO, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 22, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 14-1247-JLS (KK) (C.D. Cal. May. 22, 2016)