From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Brian

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 21, 2013
513 F. App'x 670 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-15283 D.C. No. 1:08-cv-00249-AWI-JLT

03-21-2013

MICHAEL W. HUDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TERRY BRIAN, Correctional Officer; ROBERT VOLKER, Correctional Officer, Defendants - Appellees.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Michael W. Hudson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court's judgment following a jury verdict in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that defendants violated his First Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss.

We cannot review the district court's judgment because Hudson has failed to provide the relevant trial transcripts required to review the alleged errors. On May 10, 2012, this court denied Hudson's request for production of transcripts at the government's expense without prejudice to renewal, accompanied by a showing as to which portions of the transcript were necessary to decide the issues presented. Hudson did not renew his motion. Accordingly, we are unable to review his contentions challenging the district court's evidentiary rulings and denial of Hudson's new trial motion. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169 (9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (dismissing appeal by pro se appellant for failure to provide relevant trial transcripts).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Hudson v. Brian

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 21, 2013
513 F. App'x 670 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Hudson v. Brian

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL W. HUDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TERRY BRIAN, Correctional…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

513 F. App'x 670 (9th Cir. 2013)