From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. Boggs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Jun 5, 2020
C/A No. 0:20-207-MGL-PJG (D.S.C. Jun. 5, 2020)

Opinion

C/A No. 0:20-207-MGL-PJG

06-05-2020

Bevin Hudson, Petitioner, v. Warden Boggs, FCI Williamsburg, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner Bevin Hudson, a self-represented federal prisoner, filed this habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter is before the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.) on Hudson's motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 17.)

There is no right to appointed counsel in habeas cases. See Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Hunt v. Nuth, 57 F.3d 1327, 1340 (4th Cir. 1995). Attorneys may be appointed for a person "seeking relief under section 2241, 2254, or 2255 of title 28" when "the court determines that the interests of justice so require." 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). Counsel may be appointed when counsel is necessary for effective discovery and must be appointed when evidentiary hearings are required. See Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, Rules 6(a) & 8(c), 28 U.S.C. foll. § 2254. At this time, no evidentiary hearing has been set in this case and the questions presented are not so complex as to require an attorney to effectively argue them for Petitioner. Based on the pleadings before the court, Petitioner writes well and appears capable of addressing the legal issues. Accordingly, Petitioner's request for counsel to be appointed under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B), is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

June 5, 2020
Columbia, South Carolina

/s/_________

Paige J. Gossett

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hudson v. Boggs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Jun 5, 2020
C/A No. 0:20-207-MGL-PJG (D.S.C. Jun. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Hudson v. Boggs

Case Details

Full title:Bevin Hudson, Petitioner, v. Warden Boggs, FCI Williamsburg, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

Date published: Jun 5, 2020

Citations

C/A No. 0:20-207-MGL-PJG (D.S.C. Jun. 5, 2020)

Citing Cases

Wood v. Warden, FCI Edgefield

See Rainner v. Warden, FCI Bennettsville, 2020 WL 5702103, at *3 (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 2020).See also Rice v.…