From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson Enterprises, Ltd. v. Wasserman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1998
256 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

December 28, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action ( see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment ( see, CPLR 5501).

We agree with the Supreme Court that there are no triable issues of material fact with respect to the execution of the mortgage which took place on December 14, 1994. The plaintiffs were entitled to rely upon the statutory short form power of attorney which the appellant executed and delivered to her husband and which was not revoked until March 28, 1995. The power of attorney was valid on its face and the "circumstances surrounding its presentation would not have put a reasonable person on notice that something was amiss" ( Neildan Constr. Corp. v. Angona, 209 A.D.2d 389, 390; see also, Crandall v. Personal Mtge. Corp., 210 A.D.2d 981; Grasso v. Fiumara, 167 A.D.2d 510; cf., Collision Plan Unlimited v. Bankers Trust Co., 63 N.Y.2d 827).

The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hudson Enterprises, Ltd. v. Wasserman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1998
256 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Hudson Enterprises, Ltd. v. Wasserman

Case Details

Full title:HUDSON ENTERPRISES, LTD., et al., Respondents, v. RIVKA WASSERMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1998

Citations

256 A.D.2d 550 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
682 N.Y.S.2d 465

Citing Cases

Oliveto Holdings, Inc. v. Rattenni

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiff was entitled to rely upon the statutory short form…

Madison Park Invs. LLC v. Atlantic Lofts Corp.

In the absence of proof of revocation, plaintiffs were clearly authorized to rely upon the power of attorney…