From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudkins v. Clark

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
1:21-cv-01473-NE-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01473-NE-GSA-PC

12-13-2021

TIMOTHY D. HUDKINS, Plaintiff, v. K. CLARK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING MOTION IMPROPERLY FILED IN THIS CASE (ECF No. 13.)

GARY S. AUSTIN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 9, 2021, William Brandstatt improperly filed a motion for determination of jurisdiction in this case. (ECF No. 14.) William Brandstatt is not a party in this case and should not file documents in this case. He should only file documents in his own case. Accordingly, the motion shall be stricken from the record.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion filed by William Brandstatt on December 9, 2021, is STRICKEN from the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Hudkins v. Clark

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
1:21-cv-01473-NE-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Hudkins v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:TIMOTHY D. HUDKINS, Plaintiff, v. K. CLARK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 13, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-01473-NE-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)