From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huddleson v. City of Pueblo

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 28, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01589-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2010)

Summary

In Huddleson v. City of Pueblo, 270 F.R.D. 635 (D. Colo. 2010), I addressed the competing considerations implicated in a motion to seal court documents.

Summary of this case from SBM Site Services, LLC v. Garrett

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-01589-PAB-BNB.

September 28, 2010


ORDER


This matter arises on defendant's Motion to Amend Defendant's Answer [Doc. # 30, filed 9/15/2010] (the "Motion"). Although the initial indication was that the plaintiff opposed the Motion, subsequently the parties filed a Stipulation [Doc. # 33, filed 9/28/2010] indicating that "the Plaintiff no longer opposes the Motion to Amend, [and] the parties do not believe it necessary that the hearing scheduled for September 30, 2010, take place. . . ."

IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) The Motion [Doc. # 30] is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing the Amended Answer and Jury Demand [Doc. # 30-1]; and

(2) The hearing set for September 30, 2010, at 8:30 a.m., is VACATED.

Dated September 28, 2010.


Summaries of

Huddleson v. City of Pueblo

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Sep 28, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01589-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2010)

In Huddleson v. City of Pueblo, 270 F.R.D. 635 (D. Colo. 2010), I addressed the competing considerations implicated in a motion to seal court documents.

Summary of this case from SBM Site Services, LLC v. Garrett
Case details for

Huddleson v. City of Pueblo

Case Details

Full title:RENEE HUDDLESON, Plaintiff, v. THE CITY OF PUEBLO, COLORADO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Sep 28, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-01589-PAB-BNB (D. Colo. Sep. 28, 2010)

Citing Cases

Wollam v. Wright Med. Grp., Inc.

5. Identify the restriction level sought (i.e., Level 1 = access limited to the parties and the court; Level…

United States v. Lacerda

To the extent such information exists, Mr. Neff could potentially utilize it at the expense of the United…