From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hublik v. Marrow

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Apr 10, 2014
NO. 09-14-00041-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 10, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 09-14-00041-CV

04-10-2014

HARALD HUBLIK, Appellant v. DIANE MARROW, Appellee


On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-27715


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 28, 2014, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why additional time was needed to file the record. We also notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal. The appellant did not respond to the Court's notices. The appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence and is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, and there being no satisfactory explanation for the appellant's failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

Hublik v. Marrow

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Apr 10, 2014
NO. 09-14-00041-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Hublik v. Marrow

Case Details

Full title:HARALD HUBLIK, Appellant v. DIANE MARROW, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Apr 10, 2014

Citations

NO. 09-14-00041-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 10, 2014)