From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubin v. Hubin

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 11, 2001
92 Ohio St. 3d 240 (Ohio 2001)

Summary

relying on Pauly v. Pauly, 80 Ohio St.3d 386

Summary of this case from Young v. Bishop

Opinion

Nos. 00-1406 and 00-1730.

Submitted May 30, 2001.

Decided July 11, 2001.

Appeal from and Certified by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-1156.

Douglas B. Dougherty, for appellant.

Cloppert, Portman, Sauter, Latanick Foley, Mark C. Collins and Rory P. Callahan, for appellee.

James A. Hanneman, urging reversal for amici curiae Children's and Parents' Rights Association, Parents and Children for Equality, and Children's Rights Council of Ohio.

Heather W. Tootle, urging reversal for amicus curiae Edward C. Kehres.

Michael R. Smalz, Ohio State Legal Services Association, urging affirmance for amici curiae Association for Children for Enforcement of Support, Ohio Now Education and Legal Fund, Ohio Domestic Violence Network, and Action Ohio Coalition for Battered Women.


The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Pauly v. Pauly (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 386, 686 N.E.2d 1108.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hubin v. Hubin

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 11, 2001
92 Ohio St. 3d 240 (Ohio 2001)

relying on Pauly v. Pauly, 80 Ohio St.3d 386

Summary of this case from Young v. Bishop
Case details for

Hubin v. Hubin

Case Details

Full title:Hubin, Appellant, v. Hubin, Appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 11, 2001

Citations

92 Ohio St. 3d 240 (Ohio 2001)
749 N.E.2d 749

Citing Cases

Young v. Bishop

However, the Supreme Court of Ohio recently reaffirmed its position that the statute does not provide for an…

Warzala v. Warzala

In his objections to the magistrate's initial decision, appellant requested that the trial court presume each…