From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubert v. Wilson

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
138 A. 920 (N.J. 1927)

Opinion

Argued May 17, 1927 —

Decided October 17, 1927.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 4 N.J. Mis. R. 163.

For the appellants, Elmer W. Romine.

For the respondent, Charles A. Rathbun.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — PARKER, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Hubert v. Wilson

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1927
138 A. 920 (N.J. 1927)
Case details for

Hubert v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK HUBERT ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. C. FRANKLIN WILSON, JUDGE, ETC.…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1927

Citations

138 A. 920 (N.J. 1927)
138 A. 920