From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 6, 1957
164 Tex. Crim. 372 (Tex. Crim. App. 1957)

Opinion


299 S.W.2d 293 (Tex.Crim.App. 1957) 164 Tex.Crim. 372 Morris HUBERT, Appellant,v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 28835. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. March 6, 1957

[164 TEXCRIM 372] No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Dan Walton, Dist. Atty., Thomas D. White and Joseph M. Guarino, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and [164 TEXCRIM 373] Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for murder, with punishment assessed at eight years in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts accompanying this record bears the approving signatures only of counsel for the state. Neither counsel for the appellant, the appellant, himself, nor the trial court has approved the statement of facts.

Under Art. 759a, Vernon's C.C.P., a statement of facts must be approved by the defendant or his counsel and the attorney representing the state, or the trial court.

Not having been approved as required by law, the statement of facts, here, is not subject to consideration by this court.

In the absence of a statement of facts, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Hubert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Mar 6, 1957
164 Tex. Crim. 372 (Tex. Crim. App. 1957)
Case details for

Hubert v. State

Case Details

Full title:Morris HUBERT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Mar 6, 1957

Citations

164 Tex. Crim. 372 (Tex. Crim. App. 1957)
164 Tex. Crim. 372

Citing Cases

ONG v. STATE

Under Art. 759a, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P., a statement of facts must be approved by the defendant or his counsel…

Donley v. State

Baird v. State, 162 Tex.Crim. R., 288 S.W.2d 67; Hubert v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 299 S.W.2d 293. The record…