From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubble v. Marks

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 10, 2022
3:22-cv-00277-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 10, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00277-MMD-CSD

11-10-2022

CHRISTOPHER R. HUBBLE, Plaintiff, v. DR. MARKS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Christopher Hubble, an inmate in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections, applies for in forma pauperis status in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil-rights action. (ECF No. 5). Based on the financial information provided, the Court finds that Plaintiff is unable to prepay the full filing fee in this matter. On November 9, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff's motion to exclude this action from mediation. (ECF No. 30).

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 5) is GRANTED. Plaintiff will not be required to pay an initial installment of the filing fee. But if this action is later dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

2. Plaintiff is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the necessity of prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of security therefor.

3. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act, the Nevada Department of Corrections will forward payments from the account of CHRISTOPHER R. HUBBLE, #81181 to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, 20% of the preceding month's deposits (in months that the account exceeds $10) until the full $350 filing fee has been paid for this action. The Clerk of the Court will send a copy of this order to the Finance Division of the Clerk's Office and to the attention of Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Corrections, P.O. Box 7011, Carson City, NV 89702.

4. The Clerk of the Court will electronically SERVE a copy of this order and a copy of Plaintiff's first amended complaint (ECF No. 26) on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Nevada by adding the Attorney General of the State of Nevada to the docket sheet. This does not indicate acceptance of service.

5. Service must be perfected within 90 days from the date of this order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

6. Subject to the findings of the screening order (ECF No. 25), within 21 days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General's Office will file a notice advising the Court and Plaintiff of: (a) the names of the defendants for whom it accepts service; (b) the names of the defendants for whom it does not accept service, and (c) the names of the defendants for whom it is filing the last-known-address information under seal. As to any of the named defendants for whom the Attorney General's Office cannot accept service, the Office will file, under seal, but will not serve the inmate Plaintiff the last known address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom it has such information. If the last known address of the defendant(s) is a post office box, the Attorney General's Office will attempt to obtain and provide the last known physical address(es).

7. If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), Plaintiff will file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and specifying a full name and address for the defendant(s). For the defendant(s) as to which the Attorney General has not provided last-known-address information, Plaintiff will provide the full name and address for the defendant(s).

8. If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such defendant(s) will file and serve an answer or other response to the first amended complaint (ECF No. 26) within 60 days from the date of this order.

9. Plaintiff will serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. If Plaintiff electronically files a document with the Court's electronic-filing system, no certificate of service is required. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d)(1)(B); Nev. Loc. R. IC 4-1(b); Nev. Loc. R. 5-1. However, if Plaintiff mails the document to the Court, Plaintiff will include with the original document submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If counsel has entered a notice of appearance, Plaintiff will direct service to the individual attorney named in the notice of appearance, at the physical or electronic address stated therein. The Court may disregard any document received by a district judge or magistrate judge that has not been filed with the Clerk, and any document received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the Clerk that fails to include a certificate showing proper service when required.

10. This case is no longer stayed.


Summaries of

Hubble v. Marks

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 10, 2022
3:22-cv-00277-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 10, 2022)
Case details for

Hubble v. Marks

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER R. HUBBLE, Plaintiff, v. DR. MARKS, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 10, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00277-MMD-CSD (D. Nev. Nov. 10, 2022)