From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubbard v. Soued

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 5, 2008
2:07-cv-2736-GEB-DAD-PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2008)

Opinion

2:07-cv-2736-GEB-DAD-PS.

February 5, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On January 2, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Although plaintiff has filed a second application to proceed in forma pauperis, she has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 2, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's December 18, 2007 application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied; and

3. This action is dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Hubbard v. Soued

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 5, 2008
2:07-cv-2736-GEB-DAD-PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Hubbard v. Soued

Case Details

Full title:MYRNA HUBBARD, Plaintiff, v. FREDRICK A. SOUED, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 5, 2008

Citations

2:07-cv-2736-GEB-DAD-PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2008)