From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubbard v. Rivard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOURTHERN DIVISION
Aug 9, 2011
Civil No. 2:08-CV-10034 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 2:08-CV-10034

08-09-2011

ANTHONY HUBBARD, Petitioner, v. STEVEN RIVARD, Respondent.


HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW


OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR


RECONSIDERATION

On January 24, 2011, the Court denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court also granted petitioner a certificate of appealability with respect to his claim asserting the erroneous admission of hearsay evidence and granted Petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See Hubbard v. Rivard, U.S.D.C. No. 2:08-CV-10034, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6200; No. 2011 WL 222142 (E.D. Mich. January 24, 2011). Petitioner has now filed a motion for reconsideration. For the reasons that follow, the motions for reconsideration are DENIED.

U.S. Dist.Ct. Rules, E.D. Mich. 7.1 (h) allows a party to file a motion for reconsideration. A motion for reconsideration should be granted if the movant demonstrates a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled and that a different disposition of the case must result from a correction thereof. Ward v. Wolfenbarger, 340 F. Supp. 2d 773, 774 (E.D. Mich. 2004); Hence v. Smith, 49 F. Supp. 2d 547, 550-51 (E.D. Mich. 1999). A motion for reconsideration which merely presents "the same issues ruled upon by the Court, either expressly or by reasonable implication," shall be denied. Ward, 340 F. Supp. 2d at 774.

Petitioner's motion for reconsideration will be denied, because Petitioner is merely presenting issues which were already ruled upon by this Court, either expressly or by reasonable implication, when the Court denied the petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Hence v. Smith, 49 F. Supp. 2d at 553.

Based upon the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration [Dkt. # 21] is DENIED.

Arthur J. Tarnow

Senior United States District Judge
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon parties/counsel of record on August 9, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Catherine A. Pickles

Judicial Secretary


Summaries of

Hubbard v. Rivard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOURTHERN DIVISION
Aug 9, 2011
Civil No. 2:08-CV-10034 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Hubbard v. Rivard

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY HUBBARD, Petitioner, v. STEVEN RIVARD, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOURTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 2:08-CV-10034 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 9, 2011)