From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubbard v. Bean

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Aug 25, 2022
Civil Action 5:22-CV-183 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 5:22-CV-183

08-25-2022

RAPHAE JAMAAL HUBBARD, Plaintiff, v. TROOPER A. A. BEAN, West Virginia State Trooper, TROOPER L. EVANS, West Virginia State Trooper, LYDIA LEHMAN, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, and WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOHN PRESTON BAILY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The above referenced case is before this Court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that the case be dismissed with prejudice and the Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis be denied as moot, and the fee waived.

This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file timely, written objections to the magistrate judge's report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. waives the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984), cert, denied, 467 U.S. 1208 (1984). No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

A de novo review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. 8] is ADOPTED, and plaintiff's State Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [Doc. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 2] is DENIED AS MOOT and the FEE WAIVED. This Court further DIRECTS the Clerk to STRIKE this case from the active docket of this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to any counsel of record and to mail a copy to the pro se plaintiff.


Summaries of

Hubbard v. Bean

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Aug 25, 2022
Civil Action 5:22-CV-183 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Hubbard v. Bean

Case Details

Full title:RAPHAE JAMAAL HUBBARD, Plaintiff, v. TROOPER A. A. BEAN, West Virginia…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia

Date published: Aug 25, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 5:22-CV-183 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 2022)