From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hubbard-Ragsdale Company v. Dean

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 15, 1926
15 F.2d 1013 (6th Cir. 1926)

Opinion

No. 4693.

October 15, 1926.

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio; Smith Hickenlooper, Judge.

For opinion below, see 15 F.2d 410.

Norwood J. Utter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for plaintiff in error.

Haveth E. Mau, U.S. Atty., and Simon Ross, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant in error.


Judgment of the District Court affirmed, upon the authority of Law v. United States, 266 U.S. 494, 45 S. Ct. 175, 69 L. Ed. 401; Fleischman v. United States, 270 U.S. 349, 46 S. Ct. 284, 70 L. Ed. 624; United States v. Gordin (C.C.A. 6) 9 F.2d 394.


Summaries of

Hubbard-Ragsdale Company v. Dean

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Oct 15, 1926
15 F.2d 1013 (6th Cir. 1926)
Case details for

Hubbard-Ragsdale Company v. Dean

Case Details

Full title:HUBBARD-RAGSDALE COMPANY v. Charles M. DEAN, Collector of Internal Revenue…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Oct 15, 1926

Citations

15 F.2d 1013 (6th Cir. 1926)