Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01765-REB-BNB
04-27-2012
YAO-HUNG HUANG, and BIG TIME AUTO PARTS MANUFACTURING, INC., a Taiwan corporation, Plaintiffs, v. MARKLYN GROUP, INC., d/b/a ALPENA, a Canadian corporation, Defendant.
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
ORDER
This matter arises on Defendant Marklyn Group, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Responses to Written Discovery [Doc. # 30, filed 4/10/2012] (the "Motion to Compel"). I held a hearing on the Motion to Compel this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The Motion to Compel [Doc. # 30] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN
PART as follows:
(a) GRANTED with respect to Requests for Production 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 17;
Although the defendant moved to compel on Requests for Production 3 and 9, counsel did not address those requests at the hearing, and I made no ruling with respect to them. Requests for Production 3 and 9 are denied without prejudice and may be raised again, if necessary. I expect, however, that the parties can resolve their disagreement with respect to those two requests without my further involvement based on my rulings on the other disputed requests.
(b) GRANTED with respect to Interrogatory 5;
(c) DENIED with respect to Interrogatories 2, 3, 6, and 7;
(d) GRANTED with respect to Requests for Admission 1, 2, 25, 26, and 29;
(e) DENIED with respect to Requests for Admission 3, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 38, 39, and 40.
(2) On or before May 29, 2012, the plaintiffs shall serve supplemental discovery responses consistent with this order and in full compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, produce all responsive documents, and serve a privilege log.
BY THE COURT:
Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge