From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huang v. California Pacific Medical Center

California Court of Appeals, First District, Third Division
Mar 12, 2010
No. A122004 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 12, 2010)

Opinion


MAN-LI HUANG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants and Respondents. A122004 California Court of Appeal, First District, Third Division March 12, 2010

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. 458776

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING

William R. McGuiness, P.J

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 16, 2010, be modified as follows:

On page 15, delete the second sentence of the first paragraph under the heading “II. Discrimination in Violation of FEHA,” which currently reads: “ In a disparate treatment case, the plaintiff must show that intentional discrimination was the determinative factor in the adverse employment action. (See Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins (1993) 507 U.S. 604, 610.)”

Insert the following sentence in its place: “In a disparate treatment case, the plaintiff must show that intentional discrimination “actually played a role” and “had a determinative influence” in the adverse employment action. (Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins (1993) 507 U.S. 604, 610.)”

The petition for rehearing is denied.

There is no change in the judgment.


Summaries of

Huang v. California Pacific Medical Center

California Court of Appeals, First District, Third Division
Mar 12, 2010
No. A122004 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Huang v. California Pacific Medical Center

Case Details

Full title:MAN-LI HUANG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL…

Court:California Court of Appeals, First District, Third Division

Date published: Mar 12, 2010

Citations

No. A122004 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 12, 2010)