From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hua v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 29, 2023
No. 6555-23S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 29, 2023)

Opinion

6555-23S

06-29-2023

TONY HUA, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge

On June 26, 2023, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction on the grounds that petitioner paid the tax liability for tax year 2020 before the issuance of the notice of deficiency, and, therefore, the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid. See Bendheim v. Commissioner, 214 F.2d 26, 28 (2d Cir. 1954). In his motion to dismiss, respondent indicates that petitioner does not object to the granting of the motion.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the grounds that the notice of deficiency on which this case is based is invalid.


Summaries of

Hua v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Jun 29, 2023
No. 6555-23S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 29, 2023)
Case details for

Hua v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:TONY HUA, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Jun 29, 2023

Citations

No. 6555-23S (U.S.T.C. Jun. 29, 2023)