HTP Inc. v. First Merit Grp. Holdings

Full title: HTP, INC., a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, v. FIRST MERIT GROUP…

Court: United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Oct 12, 2023

2:21-cv-00732-BJR (W.D. Wash. Oct. 12, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00732-BJR

10-12-2023

HTP, INC., a Washington corporation, Plaintiff, v. FIRST MERIT GROUP HOLDING, INC., et al., Defendants.

K&L GATES LLP Peter A. Talevich Philip M. Guess, LASHER HOLZAPFEL SPERRY & EBERSON PLLC Sean V. Small, Julie M. Pendleton, Attorneys for Defendants

BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

K&L GATES LLP Peter A. Talevich Philip M. Guess, LASHER HOLZAPFEL SPERRY & EBERSON PLLC

Sean V. Small, Julie M. Pendleton, Attorneys for Defendants

STIPULATION ACCEPTING SERVICE OF PROCESS FOR EVAN JOHNSON AND SETTING RESPONSE TO AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR ALL DEFENDANTS AND ORDER

BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

I. STIPULATION

Whereas, plaintiff HTP, Inc. (“HTP”) and defendants First Merit Holdings Inc., Nanogen Technologies Group, Inc., Barry Lee, Anthony Dutton, and David Richardson (“Original Defendants”) stipulated to HTP filing a First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 119), the Court entered the stipulation as an order (ECF No. 120), and HTP filed the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 122), and

Whereas, counsel for the Original Defendants has agreed to accept service of process for Evan Johnson (with the Original Defendants, “Defendants”), and

Whereas, the Defendants and HTP agree that the Defendants may have until November 13, 2023, to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint.

Now, therefore, the Parties stipulate:

1. The undersigned counsel for Defendants accepts service of process for Evan Johnson, and

2. Defendants may have until November 13, 2023, to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint.

II. ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered.