From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H.T. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 3, 1984
458 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-1282.

October 23, 1984. Rehearing Denied December 3, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, N. Joseph Durant, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calvin L. Fox, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.


The adjudication of delinquency under review is reversed for a new hearing because the lower court improperly failed to hold a Richardson hearing prior to admitting incriminating statements allegedly made by the respondent and not previously revealed by the state in discovery. Cumbie v. State, 345 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 1977); Balboa v. State, 446 So.2d 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The state's contentions that the defense was on prior notice of the statements, see Leeman v. State, 357 So.2d 703 (Fla. 1978), or acquiesced in the court's ruling, see Lucas v. State, 376 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 1979), are totally unsustained by the record.

Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971).


Summaries of

H.T. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 3, 1984
458 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

H.T. v. State

Case Details

Full title:H.T., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 3, 1984

Citations

458 So. 2d 802 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

S.G. v. State

Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d at 775 (emphasis supplied). Richardson's requirements are, of course, equally…