Opinion
Appellate Case No. 2014-000747 Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-262
06-08-2016
Dwight Lucas and Alice Lucas, both of Columbia, pro se. Rebecca Kinlein Lindahl and Richard L Farley, both of Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP, of Charlotte, North Carolina, for Respondent.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Richland County
Joseph M. Strickland, Master-in-Equity
AFFIRMED
Dwight Lucas and Alice Lucas, both of Columbia, pro se. Rebecca Kinlein Lindahl and Richard L Farley, both of Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP, of Charlotte, North Carolina, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Bryson v. Bryson, 378 S.C. 502, 510, 662 S.E.2d 611, 615 (Ct. App. 2008) ("An issue is deemed abandoned and will not be considered on appeal if the argument is raised in a brief but not supported by authority."); In re McCracken, 346 S.C. 87, 92, 551 S.E.2d 235, 238 (2001) ("A bald assertion, without supporting argument, does not preserve an issue for appeal."); B & A Dev., Inc. v. Georgetown Cty., 372 S.C. 261, 271, 641 S.E.2d 888, 894 (2007) ("It is well settled that an issue . . . must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review."). AFFIRMED. HUFF, A.C.J., and KONDUROS and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------