From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HSBC Bank USA v. Leiter

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51582 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)

Opinion

2004-1485 KC.

Decided September 30, 2005.

Appeal from orders of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Arthur M. Schack, J.), entered July 15, 2003 and October 29, 2003. The orders, respectively, granted defendant's motion to dismiss the action on default and denied plaintiff's motion seeking vacatur of the order dismissing the action.

Appeal from order entered July 15, 2003 unanimously dismissed.

PRESENT: PATTERSON, J.P., RIOS and BELEN, JJ.


Order entered October 29, 2003 unanimously reversed without costs, plaintiff's motion to vacate dismissal of the action granted on condition that, within 30 days of the date of the order entered hereon, plaintiff comply with defendant's discovery demands, otherwise plaintiff's motion denied; as so modified, affirmed without costs.

At the outset we note that no appeal lies from an order entered on default of the appealing party ( see CPLR 5511).

Plaintiff established a meritorious claim against defendant and a reasonable excuse for the default (CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). Therefore, the motion to vacate the order dismissing the action should have been granted on condition that plaintiff comply with defendant's discovery demands within 30 days.


Summaries of

HSBC Bank USA v. Leiter

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 2005
2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51582 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)
Case details for

HSBC Bank USA v. Leiter

Case Details

Full title:HSBC BANK USA, F/K/A MARINE MIDLAND BANK, Appellant, v. BORUCH LEITER…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 30, 2005

Citations

2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51582 (N.Y. App. Term 2005)