Opinion
3:19-CV-00265-MMD-CSD
11-30-2022
Scott E. Gizer, Nevada Bar No. 12216, Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365, EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP Michael A. Pintar, Nevada Bar No. 3789 Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP SCOTT E. GIZER Nevada Bar No. 12216 SOPHIA S. LAU Nevada Bar No. 13365 Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP DARREN T. BRENNER Nevada Bar No. 8386 Attorneys for Plaintiff HSBC BANK USA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF NOMURA HOME EQUITY LOAN, INC., ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-HE2
Scott E. Gizer, Nevada Bar No. 12216, Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365, EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP Michael A. Pintar, Nevada Bar No. 3789 Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP SCOTT E. GIZER Nevada Bar No. 12216 SOPHIA S. LAU Nevada Bar No. 13365 Attorneys for Defendant FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP DARREN T. BRENNER Nevada Bar No. 8386 Attorneys for Plaintiff HSBC BANK USA, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF NOMURA HOME EQUITY LOAN, INC., ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-HE2
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINES FOR OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT FIDELITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND REPLY TO OPPOSITION (FIRST REQUEST)
Defendant Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (“Fidelity” or “Defendant”), by and through its attorneys of record at the law firm of Early Sullivan Wright Gizer & McRae LLP and McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP and Plaintiff HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as Trustee for the Registered Holders of Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2006-HE2 (“Plaintiff' or “HSBC”), acting by and through the undersigned counsel, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP (collectively, the “Parties”), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. Plaintiff's deadline to oppose to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint was November 14, 2022.
2. The Parties agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiff's Opposition to Tuesday, November 22, 2022 in light of a server crash at Plaintiff's offices.
3. The Parties agree to extend the deadline for Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Tuesday, December 6, 2022.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.